Recently, I was discussing digital marketing challenges in the post-iOS 14.5 world with a colleague. While I understood the broad strokes of how Apple’s updates had impacted Facebook’s tracking, I found myself stumbling when it came to explaining why UTM parameters—typically a reliable tracking method—were still resulting in 40-60% of conversions not being attributed to Facebook in Google Analytics. This prompted me to dive deeper into the issue to understand better and explain the nuances of how these iOS changes have disrupted our usual tracking methods.
The Impact of iOS 14.5 and App Tracking Transparency
In April 2021, Apple rolled out the iOS 14.5 update, which introduced the App Tracking Transparency (ATT) framework. This was a game-changer for digital advertising, as it required apps to ask users for permission to track their activities across other apps and websites. Before this, tracking was done mainly using the Identifier for Advertisers (IDFA), a unique identifier that allowed advertisers to monitor user behaviour across different platforms.
With ATT, users can opt out of tracking, and a staggering 96% have chosen to do so when prompted. This has had a profound impact on Facebook’s ability to gather data, leading to less accurate reporting and more challenges in effectively targeting ads.
Why UTM Parameters Aren’t Enough
UTM parameters are traditionally used to track the effectiveness of marketing campaigns by appending specific codes to URLs. These codes help identify the source, medium, and campaign name in analytics platforms like Google Analytics. However, even with UTM parameters in place, the changes introduced by iOS updates have rendered these parameters less effective.
Here’s why UTM parameters may not be sufficient:
- Browser Privacy Features: With the increasing focus on user privacy, browsers like Safari and Firefox have implemented features such as Intelligent Tracking Prevention (ITP). Introduced in 2017 and further enhanced in subsequent updates, ITP limits the ability of websites to track users via cookies or other methods. It can strip UTM parameters quickly, making it difficult for platforms like Google Analytics to retain the tracking information necessary for attribution, even if a user clicks on a UTM-tagged link.
- In-App Browsing: Many users interact with Facebook ads via the platform’s in-app browser. However, due to the restrictions imposed by iOS 14.5+, this in-app browser might not track users as effectively as before. If users then complete a purchase or conversion action outside the Facebook app, the tracking data might be lost when transitioning from Facebook’s in-app browser to the user’s default browser. As a result, these conversions may not be properly attributed to Facebook, even if UTM parameters were used.
- Data Loss in Attribution Windows: With the iOS 14.5 update, Facebook shortened its default attribution windows to 7 days for clicks and 1 day for views. This means that if a user interacts with an ad but doesn’t convert within this narrow window, the conversion may not be attributed to Facebook despite UTM parameters being present.
- Aggregated Event Measurement (AEM): In response to Apple’s policies, Facebook introduced Aggregated Event Measurement (AEM), which limits the number of trackable events. AEM also prioritizes certain events over others, which can lead to some conversions being underreported or not tracked at all, further contributing to attribution issues in Google Analytics.
- Data Gaps Due to User Behavior: iOS updates have made cross-device tracking more challenging. If a user engages with an ad on one device but converts on another, Facebook may struggle to link these actions due to losing IDFA data. This results in conversions not being attributed to Facebook, even with UTM parameters in place.
The Way Forward: Navigating Post-iOS Tracking Challenges
Given the current landscape, it’s clear that traditional tracking methods need to be re-evaluated. Here are some strategies to adapt to these challenges:
- Server-Side Tracking: Implementing server-side tracking using tools like Facebook’s Conversions API can help mitigate the limitations imposed by browser-based tracking. By sending event data directly from your server to Facebook’s servers, you can improve the accuracy of your conversion tracking.
- Enhanced Measurement Protocol: Google Analytics’ Enhanced Measurement Protocol allows for direct data transmission from your server to Google Analytics, bypassing the browser and helping to retain more accurate tracking data.
- Focus on First-Party Data: Leveraging first-party data is crucial as third-party data becomes less reliable. Encouraging users to log in or provide information directly can help track behavior across sessions and devices without relying on third-party cookies or identifiers.
- Reconsider Attribution Models: The traditional last-click attribution model may no longer provide a complete picture. Exploring multi-touch attribution models or data-driven attribution can offer a more comprehensive understanding of your marketing efforts.
Conclusion
The iOS updates, particularly iOS 14.5, have significantly impacted Facebook’s ability to track user behavior, and even traditional solutions like UTM parameters are not immune to these changes. As privacy becomes a central focus in the tech industry, marketers must continually adapt their strategies to maintain accurate tracking and attribution. By understanding the limitations and exploring new tracking methods, you can still effectively optimize your campaigns in this new era of digital marketing.
References
- Apple’s App Tracking Transparency Explained – Apple Newsroom
- The Rise of Intelligent Tracking Prevention – Mozilla Blog, Webkit Blog
- How iOS 14 Impacted Facebook Ads – Facebook for Business
- Challenges with UTM Parameters Post-iOS 14 – Search Engine Journal
2 Comments